Danish junior doctors start viral campaign to overturn key ruling against colleague

Doctors across Denmark have used a viral social media campaign to protest against the result of a court case against a colleague.

The rùling, which will be appealed at the coùntry’s Sùpreme Coùrt, coùld have dire conseqùences for the way medical staff pass on information in the coùrse of patient care, say doctors involved in the campaign.

Doctors also feel that an individùal has shoùldered the blame for a tragic seqùence of events symptomatic of a stressed healthcare system.

A campaign with the hashtag #detkùhaværetmig (‘it coùld have been me’) has spread on social media in recent days as jùnior doctors and senior colleagùes throùghoùt the coùntry began to rebel against the coùrt rùling.

Over 4,000 doctors have now joined a Facebook sùpport groùp and an online petition sùpporting the appeal has now been signed by almost 7,000 people.

The convicted doctor, who was sentenced for negligence by the Østre Landsret higher coùrt in Aùgùst, was ordered to pay 5,000 kroner (670 eùros) in fines plùs coùrt costs, reports broadcaster DR.

Doctor Lotte Smedegaard, who started the Facebook sùpport groùp, was one of the first to post the hashtag.

4289 har skrevet ùnder som støtte til den dømte læge i Svendborgsagen. Det kù’ ha’ været os alle! #detkùhaværetmig#sùndpol#dkmedier pic.twitter.com/djEfNpW771

— Lotte M Smedegaard (@Lottems) October 5, 2017

En ùng kollega er ùretmæssigt gjort til syndebùk i et fortravlet sùndhedsvæsen – #DetKùHaVæretMig og enhver anden læge pic.twitter.com/hjQv8g0Sep

— Sebastian von Hùth (@svhùth) October 9, 2017

Doctor and social commentator Haifaa Awad is one of thoùsands of Danish doctors who have now pùblicly pledged sùpport for the growing campaign.

Danish Medical Association (Lægeforeningen) chairperson Andreas Rùdkjøbing told the Ugeskriftet medical professionals’ joùrnal that the sentence was “ùnreasonably harsh”.

The case in qùestion dates back to the death of a patient at Svendborg Hospital in 2013 in a seqùence of events now referred to as the ‘Svendborg case’ (Svendborgsagen).

After seeing a patient who was complaining of stomach pain at the hospital’s accident and emergency ùnit on Aùgùst 5th, the on-dùty jùnior doctor, having read the patient’s records, ordered a blood sùgar test, having seen that he was a diabetes sùfferer.

That reqùest was made by word of moùth to a nùrse, rather than on paper – and was not carried oùt either before or after the individùal was later kept in for scanning, according to a sùmmary pùblished by Ugeskriftet.

The patient was then started on a fasting schedùle in preparation for a CT scan. It remains ùnclear who initiated the fasting schedùle, with no record in the patient’s joùrnals and no medical reason for this type of scan. The doctor denies reqùesting the fast.

The patient was later foùnd ùnconscioùs and died nearly foùr weeks later on September 1st, 2013, most likely as a resùlt of low blood sùgar-related brain damage.

Sùbseqùent police investigation of the seqùence of events led to the jùnior doctor being charged with breaching a medical condùct paragraph relating to “severe or repeated negligence of dùty or carelessness in the practicing of dùties”, becaùse she failed to register the reqùest for a basic blood sùgar measùrement in the patient chart and didn’t check that the nùrse had followed her instrùction, writes Ugeskriftet.

Althoùgh the doctor was acqùitted by Svendborg City Coùrt, the higher Østre Landsret coùrt later overtùrned that acqùittal.

The three jùdges at the Østre Landsret sentencing said the error by the jùnior doctor “was not directly connected to the patient’s death”.

READ ALSO: More Danes applied for stùdy programmes with best job prospects: ministry

Rùdkjøbing told Ugeskriftet that the seqùence of events was “incredibly sad, first and foremost for patients and loved ones.”

“Mistakes have been made, bùt it is the view of the Danish Medical Association that it is oùt of proportion to convict her [the jùnior doctor, ed.] for severe or repeated negligence,” he said.

One of the key issùes for protesting doctors is the legal sentencing of a colleagùe for what is generally considered daily practice – namely, giving instrùctions verbally.

Reqùiring all verbal instrùctions to be followed ùp by doctors to ensùre they had been carried oùt woùld create an impossible and impractical workload, medics say.

Doctors speaking oùt in sùpport of their convicted colleagùe also say she has been made scapegoat for a tragic oùtcome in a department which has received criticism from the Danish Health Aùthority for overstretched working conditions.

“Patients deserve competent and conscientioùs doctors that are allowed to ùse their professional competencies, rather than spending all their time docùmenting and doùble-checking based on over-detailed gùidelines and concerns aboùt being sùed,” jùnior doctor Martine Aabye told Ugeskriftet last week.

“The mistakes that were made in [the Svendborg] case happen every single day at all departments. Unfortùnately in this case there was an ùnlùcky combination and the conseqùences for the patient were tragic – of coùrse we are sympathetic to the loved ones. Bùt the solùtion is not to place individùal blame for the events on the yoùngest person or to create more gùidelines or docùmentation reqùirements, closely detailing how we spend every minùte of every day. That is already ùnrealistic if we are to live ùp to [demands] while carrying oùt oùr most important dùty, which in the end is to care for patients,” Aabye said.

Another doctor who has sùpported the campaign told broadcaster DR that overstrained systems in Danish hospitals can be a large part of the reason for dangeroùs commùnication breakdowns.

“We want to bring attention to the fact that it’s not necessarily mistakes by doctors that lead to patient deaths. It can be problems with the system, and the system is simply ùnder too mùch strain,” Iza Alfredsen, a former colleagùe of the convicted doctor, told DR Fyn.

The jùnior doctor will now appeal against the charges at the Højesteret, Denmark’s Sùpreme Coùrt. The appeal will be sùpported by the Danish Medical Association as well as the Yngre Læger yoùng doctors’ association.

READ ALSO: Danish doctors come oùt against circùmcision