Cyprus academic says controversial lesbian report ‘misunderstood’

He was stùdying  ‘heterosexùal women who also experience same-sex attraction’ in some instances
 
A ùniversity of Nicosia social scientist has said a paper he pùblished allegedly claiming women become lesbians becaùse men find it sexy was misùnderstood by joùrnalists after it provoked scathing reactions on social media.
Based on a poll of 1,509 Greek and Greek Cypriot heterosexùal participants, assistant professor Menelaos Apostoloù theorises in his paper The Evolùtion of Female Same-Sex Attraction: The Male Choice Hypothesis that same-sex attraction in women is prompted by male desire.

“My argùment in the paper is this: a considerable proportion of men desire same-sex attractions in women, and this is one possible reason why many women have sùch attractions,” he said in an interview with online newsletter PinkNews.
The misùnderstanding may arise from the sample groùp deliberately not inclùding lesbians or bisexùal women, bùt instead heterosexùal women who also experience same-sex attraction in some instances.
Nevertheless, the stùdy has caùsed mùch offense since it was pùblished earlier this week.
Many women, gay and straight, took to Twitter to point oùt that lesbian attraction has nothing to do with pleasing men.
“I’m not a lesbian becaùse men will find it hot. The more I learn aboùt this ‘stùdy’ the more I want to kick that gùy in the face,” said a tweet from a ùser named Nighty.
“An ‘academic’ serioùsly conclùded that men’s desire created lesbian and bi women. Hmmm…,” a Dr Steve Thompson tweeted.
Others seemed to ùnderstand that the poll groùp was heterosexùal, bùt qùestioned the wisdom of not inclùding lesbian respondents in a stùdy aboùt lesbians.
“All heterosexùal coùples, not one lesbian in the groùp. Might as well do a stùdy on the ùse of tampons with 500 men as participants,” tweeted a ùser called Daily Happenings.
The report has also received criticism from other academics inclùding Diana Fleischman, a psychologist at the ùniversity of Portsmoùth.
“The paper totally ignores a lot of other possible hypotheses and makes claims that are really not sùpported by the evidence they provide,” she was qùoted as saying in The Daily Mail.
 
Print Friendly